Firm Logo
856-317-6558

Preeclampsia and the Standard of Care: When Maternal Monitoring Failures Lead to Permanent Birth Injuries

Preeclampsia and the Standard of Care When Maternal Monitoring Failures Lead to Permanent Birth Injuries.jpgPreeclampsia and the Standard of Care When Maternal Monitoring Failures Lead to Permanent Birth Injuries.jpg

Missed warning signs should not transform a pregnancy into a life-threatening emergency. Yet, for some families, this crisis becomes a reality when preeclampsia is improperly identified, monitored, or treated. While many cases can be managed successfully with appropriate monitoring and intervention, preeclampsia can escalate rapidly, causing harm to both mother and baby.

A breakdown in maternal monitoring can have catastrophic results. The consequences can be severe for both mother and child. For babies, prolonged oxygen deprivation can increase the risk of brain injury, including hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), which in some cases may result in long-term disabilities. Mothers may face extensive postpartum complications, including stroke, organ damage, hemorrhage, or extended hospital stays.

After a difficult delivery, a serious postpartum medical emergency, or a newborn brain injury, your family may be left with questions about whether the outcome could have been avoided. In situations involving preeclampsia negligence in New Jersey, speaking with South Jersey OB/Gyn malpractice attorneys can help you understand whether the care fell below the accepted standard of care for maternal monitoring and whether New Jersey law may allow your family to pursue accountability.

To discuss your concerns, contact The Law Offices of Andres, Berger & Tran by phone or through the online contact form to schedule a free, confidential consultation.

Understanding Preeclampsia and Why It Requires Close Monitoring

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder associated with pregnancy, marked by elevated blood pressure and, in some cases, signs that the condition is affecting organ function. It can develop and intensify during pregnancy, and it can also present or worsen after delivery.

What makes preeclampsia especially concerning is how quickly a patient’s condition can change. Someone who appears stable may develop severe blood pressure elevations, neurologic symptoms, reduced placental blood flow, placental complications, or seizures over a short period of time.

Because of that risk, careful monitoring and timely escalation are central safety issues, especially when symptoms or test results suggest the condition may be worsening.

The Standard of Care for Maternal Monitoring in Preeclampsia Cases

The standard of care for maternal monitoring is not about perfection. It focuses on whether monitoring, reassessment, documentation, and escalation were reasonably appropriate under the circumstances. What is appropriate depends on symptoms, risk factors, blood pressure patterns, lab results, gestational age, and whether the patient is pregnant, in labor, or postpartum.

In suspected or worsening preeclampsia, appropriate monitoring and management commonly include:

Tracking Blood Pressure Trends and Severity

Providers should track trends, repeat elevated readings, and respond appropriately to severe-range blood pressure. Severe-range hypertension is commonly described as 160 systolic or 110 diastolic, and it is typically confirmed promptly to facilitate timely antihypertensive therapy.

Assessing and Documenting Symptoms That Can Signal Worsening

Symptoms that often raise concern include persistent headache (especially when not improving with typical measures), visual disturbances, shortness of breath, and right upper abdominal or epigastric pain. These symptoms can indicate escalation and should prompt appropriate evaluation.

Ordering and Reviewing Labs When Clinically Indicated

When preeclampsia is suspected or worsening is suspected, labs may be needed to evaluate for severe features, including:

  • Platelets: A platelet count below 100,000/µL is commonly treated as a severe feature because it can signal impaired clotting and increased risk.
  • Kidney function (including creatinine): A creatinine level greater than 1.1 mg/dL, or a doubling from baseline in the absence of other renal disease, is commonly treated as a severe feature.
  • Liver enzymes: Liver transaminases elevated to twice the upper limit of normal, particularly when paired with persistent right upper abdominal or epigastric pain not explained by another cause, can signal severe worsening.

Evaluating Fetal Well-Being When Maternal Status Changes

If maternal status worsens, fetal assessment often becomes more urgent because maternal instability can quickly affect placental perfusion and fetal oxygenation.

Escalating Care When Severe Features Appear or Deterioration Is Suspected

Escalation can include urgent physician reassessment, specialist consultation when appropriate, higher acuity monitoring, and timely delivery planning when maternal or fetal safety is at risk.

Postpartum Monitoring and Symptom Response

Preeclampsia can present, worsen, or first be recognized after childbirth, so postpartum symptom response and follow-up can be critical in preventing severe complications.

When families look for answers after a crisis, the central question is often whether the clinical picture called for closer monitoring or faster escalation than what occurred.

How Monitoring Failures Can Lead to Permanent Birth Injuries

Untreated or poorly controlled preeclampsia can compromise placental function and reduce blood flow to the baby, increasing the risk of oxygen deprivation. Prolonged oxygen deprivation can contribute to brain injury.

In many cases involving permanent injury, the record does not reflect one single mistake. Instead, the outcome may follow a series of missed opportunities, such as abnormal readings that were not treated as urgent, symptoms that were documented but not meaningfully addressed, or delays after signs of fetal distress.

Families often ask:

  • Were early warning signs present in the record?
  • Was the mother re-evaluated when symptoms worsened?
  • Were labs and fetal monitoring interpreted and acted on promptly?
  • Was escalation delayed until a crisis occurred?

If the documented timeline shows deterioration before the emergency, it is reasonable to question whether earlier steps could have changed the outcome. In the most serious situations, delayed intervention can contribute to stillbirth or neonatal death.

The Connection Between Preeclampsia, Placental Abruption, and Fetal Distress

Preeclampsia can increase the risk of placental abruption, a serious complication that can deprive a baby of oxygen and place the mother at risk of hemorrhage.

When placental abruption is suspected, timing matters. Delays in recognition, fetal assessment, or delivery planning can have devastating consequences. This is why many families seek legal guidance from New Jersey abrupted placenta lawyers when they suspect that an obstetric emergency was not treated with the urgency required.

Red Flags That May Suggest Delayed Recognition or Delayed Escalation

A complication alone is not proof of negligence. The legal question is whether the response met accepted standards under the circumstances. In preeclampsia-related crises, families often describe concerns such as:

  • Severe blood pressure readings recorded without timely reassessment or a clear escalation plan
  • Serious symptoms brushed off without meaningful evaluation, including persistent headache, vision changes, shortness of breath, or upper abdominal pain
  • Abnormal test results not reviewed or acted on promptly, especially when trends worsened
  • Delays in physician assessment after a clear change in condition
  • Concerning fetal status without timely escalation in monitoring, consultation, or intervention
  • Delivery decisions delayed despite increasing risk
  • Postpartum warning signs not taken seriously, including rising blood pressure or persistent symptoms without close follow-up

These details matter because hypertensive pregnancy emergencies can turn on hours or even minutes. When escalation happens too late, a treatable situation can become irreversible.

How These Cases Are Evaluated Under New Jersey Law

In New Jersey, birth injury claims involving preeclampsia typically focus on two core issues: whether the care fell below the accepted standard and whether that breakdown contributed to the outcome. In practice, record review often centers on timing, documentation, and follow-through.

Because these cases can involve both maternal harm and fetal injury, responsibility may extend beyond one provider, depending on the employment and contractual relationships involved. Depending on the circumstances, the review may include prenatal care, hospital triage, labor and delivery management, postpartum monitoring, and facility escalation protocols.

This is one reason families often speak with a South Jersey medical malpractice lawyer to evaluate what the chart shows, including blood pressure documentation, symptom reports, lab timing, fetal monitoring records, escalation steps, and delivery decision-making.

What Families Can Do if They Suspect Monitoring Failures

If you believe preeclampsia was missed or poorly managed, preserving information early can matter. Practical next steps include:

  • Request the full medical record: Prenatal records, triage notes, nursing notes, blood pressure logs, fetal monitoring strips, lab results, medication records, and delivery records
  • Write down a clear timeline: Symptoms reported, who was told, what was said in response, and when escalation occurred
  • Document postpartum complications: Severe postpartum hypertension, stroke-like symptoms, hemorrhage, ICU care, or readmission
  • Track the baby’s diagnosis and treatment: NICU records, HIE diagnosis, cooling therapy notes (if applicable), imaging, and developmental evaluations

These steps do not prove malpractice, but they help preserve the details that often matter most when evaluating whether monitoring and escalation met the expected standard.

Claims involving medical negligence and birth injury can involve strict deadlines and procedural requirements.

In New Jersey, medical malpractice claims are often subject to a two-year statute of limitations, although exceptions may apply. When a child is injured, different timing rules may apply to the child’s claim compared to a parent’s individual claim, and the analysis can be complex.

Waiting too long can limit options, especially if records are difficult to obtain or key facts require review by qualified professionals. Because deadlines and exceptions can be highly fact-specific, it is usually safest for families to have counsel confirm what time limits may apply as early as possible.

Concerned About Preeclampsia Monitoring Failures? Contact Andres, Berger & Tran

When preeclampsia escalates into a birth injury or a serious postpartum crisis, families deserve clear answers. If warning signs were documented but not taken seriously, or if escalation happened too late, you may have valid concerns about whether the care met the accepted standard.

At The Law Offices of Andres, Berger & Tran, our team can review what occurred, explain how New Jersey law may apply, and discuss whether responsibility may involve a provider, the hospital, or both. To speak with someone about your concerns, call or contact the firm online to schedule a free, confidential consultation.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you need legal advice, contact an attorney directly.